Author: vote@matera.us

Budget and Overrides and the sky is falling, but not really…

Here is where I’m at on budgets and overrides and things of this nature.

First – I am against any cuts to the early learning center and elementary school first and foremost because I believe that these two buildings have the most potential for growth. Kids and families connect with each other and their teachers in these buildings. They do youth in town and connect with the kids they’ll grow up together with. These schools also are where kids form the foundations for learning. Here they learn phonics, site words and pronunciation and how to read; in addition to math skills, science and socialization skills with their peers. These are the building blocks to success later on in school! Numerous studies have also shown that lower class sizes in K-3 create a foundation for learning that lasts long into middle and high school and life. As I mentioned at one of the School Committee meetings – we all remember who our kindergarten teacher was…

Second we need to grapple with the demographic decline in the Northeast and ultimately the Sutton Public Schools. Indeed in DESE Enrollment by Grade report for school years 2023 – 2026 all of our schools, except for the Middle School show decline as shown in the chart below:

School2022-232023-242024-252025-264-yr Change
Early Learning 326339324307-19 (-5.8%)
Elementary 304313287293-11 (-3.6%)
Middle School 296295313318+22 (+7.4%)
High School 369363367336-33 (-8.9%)
District Total1,2951,3101,2911,254-41 (-3.2%)

Running the data through a linear regression model out to 2028-2029 shows more projected decline, with just moderate growth in the Middle School

School2026-272027-282028-29Trend
Early Learning~306~299~292↓ Declining
Elementary~285~279~273↓ Declining
Middle School~327~335~343↑ Growing
High School~335~326~316↓ Declining
District Total~1,253~1,239~1,224↓ Declining

These are facts, and it’s unfortunate – but these are the facts that we, as a community are currently faced with. The largest declines show in the Middle School and High School – the single most alarming signal in the dataset is the Grade 8 to Grade 9 survival rate of only ~78.5% — meaning roughly 1 in 5 students leaving Middle School does NOT enroll at Sutton High School. This shows up in the numbers last year: 94 eighth graders in 2024-25, but only 68 enrolled as freshmen in 2025-26 — a loss of 26 students in a single transition.

FTE Levels in the high school have not responded appropriately, and in spite of offering over 30 electives kids still leave for schools like Blackstone Valley Tech or private schools. Class sizes and schedules have not been adjusted and we do not have enforced minimum class size requirements – thus creating situations where one teacher will have some sections of under 10 kids. Practically until this is adjusted we actually can’t understand what our true FTE counts are or what they need to be. Further since 85% of the budget is salaries (which compound year over year via contractual obligations and step/lane changes) simply throwing more money at the problem creates a snowball effect longer term.

Common sense dictates that we cannot continue operating in the same way as before. So what should we do?

In my opinion we ought to focus on the early experience, creating smaller class sizes and giving kids the 1:1 attention they need to succeed. It’s my hope that by building back these experiences that we’ll retain kids and slowly stabilize the high school enrollment. We also ought to look at strategically bringing some career technical programs to help retain kids as well – these programs come with grants as seed money, but will require focused operational oversight to makes sure we are not exceeding budget. Further, the high school should focus on what our core responsibilities are – education children to be college or work ready. This means a sober look at our electives vs requirements and focusing more on core ELA/MATH/SCI curriculum. Our test scores have been in decline and with a total enrollment of under 400 students there’s no reason why every child in the high school shouldn’t be a high achiever and still get the electives that they want!

But what about an override?

We can’t solve a structural deficit composed primarily from unbalanced FTE counts by simply giving the district more money. 85% of our budget is composed of salaries which compound year over year. Without right sizing our staffing, and figuring out long term what we want our district to be, there is simply NO justification for an operational override for the schools. I’m not saying there won’t ever be a need for more money but it is not justifiable right now based on the facts and data. The pro override voices are loud but small. They advocate for more money and make vague platitudes about trusting the educators.

These platitudes do little to lower the burden of high gas prices and an inflationary economy where most peoples wages simply have not kept up. Those who are pro override would also quickly dismiss our most vulnerable namely the elderly, retired, and the 200 families who use our food pantry – these are the people who would be affected most when their property taxes are increased. We need to protect these people and shouldn’t be so hasty to simply raise their taxes!

Class Size Matters

I read an interesting study on how your Kindergarten class affects your earnings. The study was done out of Harvard and there was a collaboration with the National Bureau of Economic research. The authors analyzed the Project STAR study where 11,571 students in. Tennessee and their teachers were randomly assigned to classrooms within their schools from Kindergarten to Third Grade. The key difference in this study was the linking of the participants to IRS data to understand income levels.

I think it’s important to highlight some key aspects of this study.

  • Students in lower class sizes in K-3 are 1.6x more likely to attend college before age 27.
  • Students in lower class sizes from K-3 after controlling for demographics earn 3.4% more than students in larger classes.
  • Students in lower class sizes in K-3 generally have higher test scores.
  • The study also highlighted other things like having a 401k, home ownership, mobility rates, etc – all of which are thought of as proxies for having a “good job”

What does this mean for Sutton? It means that we need to think long term about where we cut and what we cut.

If we believe that the Early Learning Center and the Elementary school are the foundations of our district – why would we cut teachers from them?

If we believe that high achievement and academic rigor is important to make our district competitive – why would we cut out our very core.

If we want students to stay in district and build long lasting relationships – why would we consign students in the early years of developing academic, social and emotional skills into higher class sizes where they will loose the very 1:1 help that they need?

We need to make cuts, but we need to be smart about it.

Here’s a link to the study I mentioned

https://opportunityinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/star_paper.pdf

My Statement on the Secretary of Education’s Visit

I for one welcome the visit from the secretary of education, just as I would welcome a visit from any secretary of education whether a democrat or a republican is in charge. I hope the visit gets rescheduled! I frankly was excited when I heard that along with Secretary McMahon that Massachusetts Commissioner of Education was going to come along for the visit. We have an excellent school system in Sutton and it’s important that we welcome visitors into the district to showcase the excellent teachers and staff members along with the quality education we are providing. Along with that visit, I certainly intended to broach conversations about aid and grant funding – I’m sure my other colleagues would do so as well. 

I was equally disappointed when, after superintendent Paget sent her email, that the School Committee was inundated with emails from “concerned” parents all of them with the same wording advocating an “emergency” meeting of the school committee to address these issues. 

Another common theme amongst the emails was a concern from parents about student safety. One parent, Heather Sperring, even mentioned this on the “Sutton Site,” a volunteer-run Facebook group that news about this event was posted to Reddit, an internet discussion platform known for such infamous subreddit discussion forums like /WTF, and  /RegretfulParents. One facebook commenter named Amk Graveson opined as follows and I quote:

I felt the need to review the Reddit post that Mrs. Sperring graciously linked – and I was frankly shocked. Another concerned parent – screen name Lynn Duhh said:

Not terribly disturbing, but in another thread on the same post she replies to a Reddit User called yerbamateblood who asks:

Another concerned parent posting on Reddit – threelittlesith said:

I even saw Tracy Novick, our coordinator from the supposedly apolitical MASC organization, post on the Reddit thread. These types of posts are not helpful and create the permission structure for violence – let me make that clear – when you participate in the name calling and all of this McMahon is rapist, or this group is racist nonsense you are creating a permissive structure for political violence! 

My point is simple – if you care about your kids safety and if you care about the safety of children throughout the district why would you post on reddit inviting the internet and all the craziness that this brings into our town? I’ll answer that one – you don’t care about safety, nor do you care about the safety of the kids in the district. 

Here’s the shameful thing: a group of people coordinated together to stop a visit from the US Department of Education. And they did it because of who is in charge. You can’t be a supporter of the department of education when a democrat is in charge and then a protester during the next administration. That’s not normal, it’s not helpful – it’s cowardly. It doesn’t help celebrate the country, and it certainly doesn’t help the children.

So my advice is this – rather than being an activist, concentrate on being a good citizen – focus on areas where you can agree with people, politely disagree when you can’t. Treat other people the way you want to be treated, and be a good neighbor to your fellow Americans. Maybe that’s the real civic lesson here… 

Zero Based Budgeting

Zero Based Budgeting

Zero Based Budgeting and Sutton Schools

I’m against an override for the Sutton Schools. And some people might ask the question – how can you support quality programs for students while also being against an override?

Fundamentally we need to measure and quantify each one of our expenses so that they can be justified OR removed if there’s not data to support the spending decision. This is as true for our Spectrum Internet Bill ($21,000) or, our Backup Renewal ($13,500), as it is for our copier paper ($5,000). One approach that can help accomplish this is something called Zero Based Budgeting.

Zero Based Budgeting (ZBB) is an approach whereby every spending line item must be justified from scratch e.g.: 0 and NOT simply carried over from a prior year with incremental increases. In the above examples – of course we need internet, but are we getting the best deal on internet? Can we sign up for a multi-year contract and spread the cost out over multiple fiscal years? Are we fully utilizing our backup renewal (whatever that is..) can we consolidate our Google Drive Backup ($4,250) into this – thus saving $4,250 per year which can get allocated elsewhere – specifically to learning outcomes for example!

Taxpayers are not a piggy bank to be emptied when we need more money. Because our taxpayer dollars are scarce, Zero Based Budgeting allows us to scrutinize expenses and using quantifiable data – justify the same expenditure or an increase in an expenditure each fiscal year. This is different than the alternative which is to simply carry the cost over to the next fiscal year and assume a % increase.

ZBB helps in building transparency and transparency builds trust – as a district beholden to taxpayers it’s absolutely critical that we justify where and why every single dollar is being spent. Adopting a zero based budgeting approach helps ensure that every dollar in the school budget is tied to either 1. A learning outcome, or 2. An operational efficiency. We need a school budget that is driven by data and Zero Based Budgeting helps accomplish this.

Below is a video cut from my forum answers and helps emphasize my thinking around dealing with tight budgets:

Sutton High News Q&A

Sutton High News Q&A

Sutton High New Article

I had the opportunity to answer questions from the Sutton High School newspaper staff – here they are:

What is your name, how long have you lived in Sutton, and how many children do you have in or have had in the Sutton Public Schools (how long were they there)?

My name is Christopher Matera and I’ve lived in Sutton since 2012. We moved to Sutton to be closer to family and because of the amazing school system. My wife and I have three children with two in the Sutton School System (High School Freshman, and 7th grade Middle School), the third is in pre kindergarten. I’ve had the great privilege of serving on the Zoning Board of Appeals since 2018. This experience has allowed me to play a small role in helping the town and community grow, as well working in a committee setting and coming to consensus decisions.

What are the best features of the Sutton Public Schools?

We have had a fantastic experience in the district. One of our children was a late reader and Sutton provided excellent learning opportunities and support systems especially in the special education department. We have an amazing music and band program. It’s been such a joy watching our older child excel at the flute under the instruction of the music faculty. The High School has notably taken the lead on digital wellbeing. Finally I think the best part of the school system has been the faculty and some of the administrators we’ve had the opportunity to be in contact with; their open communication has certainly helped our kids stay on track.

What is the most crucial issue facing public education?

We live in an interesting time, when universities like Harvard are offering remedial mathematics classes to address the lack of foundational algebra skills or when ELA scores are in decline on standardized tests like MCAS the major issue facing public education is how do we prepare our students with the critical skills they need to succeed whether they choose college or to enter the workforce.

No one can question the value of public education, indeed in his letters to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson wrote, in an epilogue entitled “Securing the Republic,” that “Above all things I hope the education of the common people will be attended to; convinced that on their good sense we may rely with the most security for the preservation of a due degree of liberty.”

Moreover John Adams in his paper “A Dissertation on the Canon and the Feudal Law” wrote that “…Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right from the frame of their nature, to knowledge…”

In my view our schools need to take a common sense approach and redouble our efforts focused on providing core English, Math, and Science instruction that strengthens our students and enables them to be good citizens and leaders either in college or in the workforce.

How can we properly fund education without dramatically raising taxes?

We have faced several years of punishing inflation and while the rate of inflation has slowed to approximately 2.4% as of March, the cumulative effect of inflation from 2021-2025 has been approximately 18% meaning something that cost $1 in 2021 now costs $1.18. This increase in cost has affected everything from groceries to the cost of energy. While we all feel the cost of inflation, the elderly and those on retirement income are feeling this the most. These rising costs have also created a challenge when you consider how to fund education and other municipal services.

The funding challenge is not unique to only Sutton. Other districts, recognizing this challenge, have taken novel approaches – some of which could help Sutton. For instance, while many schools keep track of alumni on sites like classmates.com etc, districts have created actual Alumni Associations to not only track alumni, but also to fundraise as a revenue source. 

In Gloucester Massachusetts in 2005, the New Balance corporation pledged $500,000 for naming rights to the school stadium payable over 10 years. Other districts like Hopkington have policies on naming rights for buildings and facilities because they see this as a way of raising revenue without going to the taxpayer.

Our school’s FY26 budget is $22,965,330 this was accomplished by making some difficult choices. As a district we need to continue to do our best to live within our budget and it’s incumbent on us to offset as much of the cost of education as we can without seeking an override and passing these costs to the taxpayer and our vulnerable seniors.

What do you want to see happen in Sutton Public Schools over the next three years?

For the Simonian and Elementary school, I’d like to see implementable measurements for the investments the district has made in curriculum for the K-5 levels both in Math and English and would love to see continued investment in our special education services. 

For the Middle school, and I would expect some of this is due to COVID, I would like to see an action plan discussed with milestones to get our 6th and 7th grade MCAS scores to at least the 50% baseline followed by a plan to bring them above the baseline. This might involve evaluating our current ELA curriculum and making appropriate changes.

For the High School we should investigate and potentially partner with the University of Massachusetts System if feasible, as part of the Commonwealth Collegiate Academy. This program allows High School students to take classes at a partner UMass School and earn both high school and college credit. As an early college program it also helps smooth the transition of students from high school to college. I’d also love to see more publicity and options around the Commonwealth Dual Enrollment program (CDEP) which helps students take college classes at community colleges and state universities. While CDEP doesn’t provide all the support of an early college program it can help fill the gaps where Sutton cannot provide courses.

For the district in general, I’d love to see an interactive budget dashboard similar to what our new town manager did for the town of Rutland; this would allow parents to download and really interrogate the spending and budget data adding even more transparency to the process.

How much input should parents have into the classroom curriculum? What should happen when state requirements conflict with parental concerns?

I define parental input as being informed about what and how their children are being taught in the classroom. Families entrust their children to the district and, in doing that, trust that their children are being taught in an appropriate manner. Unfortunately we hear stories on the news about incidents and curriculum being taught in some school systems that many parents might not agree with. When this happens it breaks trust and causes parents to wonder “could this happen here?” 

It’s the responsibility of the district to be radically transparent in communicating to parents what, and how, the children in their care are being taught. 

When conflict occurs parents should have the absolute right to opt-out their child. This to me is akin to understanding the menu of a restaurant and what ingredients go into the dish. Once I understand what’s on the menu it’s my right as a parent to not partake.

When conflicts occur with state requirements, the school committee needs to step in to understand parents’ concerns and, if necessary,  advocate with DESE and our elected representatives for parents and their parental rights. 

Ultimately the best form of education is one in which the local community is in control.

What made you decide to seek election or re-election?

I’m concerned with the long term budget of the district. The school is the largest budget item in the town and it is important that we are focusing these taxpayer funds efficiently and effectively. We need to use our limited resources to bolster our core subjects like English, Science, and Math; strengthening and equipping our kids to compete whether they choose college or another career path.

As I mentioned previously Sutton is a multigenerational community and I’m passionate about working with the administration to understand the budget and live within our means; I don’t believe in simply advocating for more resources, passing costs onward to our taxpayers and elderly without a deep dive into creative solutions to bring in new revenue.

I’m also passionate about solutions. As a manager I try to encourage my staff to never bring a problem without at least some idea of the solution. As a member of the school committee I believe it’s my job to listen and represent the public bridging the gap between resident, parent and school administration – and that’s what I’ll do.

What are your primary credentials that make you an excellent candidate?

I’ve worked in higher education for nearly 20 years in various positions. I began in a Financial Aid office and saw both the amazing benefits of Financial Aid in helping our students, but also the negative effects of crippling debt on new college graduates. 

This experience gave me a deep understanding of the college admissions process and what characteristics, background, and high school coursework can make the difference between an admission or a denial.

In my higher education IT work I’ve managed and implemented workflow solutions handling almost two million pages of documents a year for a large university system mainly in admissions, financial aid, and student registrar offices. In this experience I brought key decision makers from various levels like CIO, Associate Vice President for Admissions, down to the clerical staff to work together to create a process which turned admission decision time from weeks to days. 

This experience taught me to never settle for “it’s the way we’ve always done it,” and to always ask why until you come to the right solution.

Not settling for the status quo and bringing innovative solutions are precisely why I am uniquely qualified for this position.

If elected, how will you work to find common ground with your fellow school committee members?

The committee is a microcosm of the town bringing people from many different backgrounds and perspectives together. That being said, it’s very important to understand people’s perspectives even if you don’t always agree with them. Local boards like the school committee are a marketplace of ideas where reasoned discussion should lead to the best possible solutions. Humility and the ability to disagree without being disagreeable are critical skills to building consensus with fellow board members, and this is how I’ll operate.

What specific message would you like to share with the voters?

It’s a privilege to call Sutton home. Our community has deep roots and a rich history from Waters Farm to the Eight Lots School House. This spirit shines through in our community from events like Waters Farm Days to the Fourth of July and Memorial Day celebrations. We are also a multigenerational community, welcoming new families while preserving and protecting our seniors.

The school is a critical part of our community – but it doesn’t exist in a vacuum.  We need committee members who can bridge the gap with all aspects of our community from elected representatives, to parents, to other town departments, and to taxpayers. It’s critical that committee members can listen and understand their constituents’ viewpoints and then bring those views to the committee – and this is what I’ll do.

I’ll bring a common sense approach to the school committee, that’s the difference between me and my opponents and that’s why I’m asking for your vote.

Innovation in Education

Innovation in Education

Innovation

What’s interesting in this particular article is that homeschoolers/private schools/and public school models can all coexist under one roof AND each model can contribute to the success of the other. This is exactly the kind of innovation that can help modernize education, it’s not public vs. private vs. homeschoolers it’s about our kids and giving them the best education that meets their needs. That’s common sense!

https://standtogether.org/stories/education/public-vs-private-education-why-not-both

Standardized Testing

Standardized Testing

Standardized Testing

Do standardized tests have problems? Sure. However, according to a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research – standardized test scores, particularly how well you do on them correlate very strongly to your first year performance in college – even more so than GPA.

Second, in contrast with standardized test scores, high school GPA has relatively little predictive power for academic success during a student’s first year. Comparing students with a perfect 4.0 high school GPA to those with a 3.2 GPA – a gap of the same magnitude in the distribution of applicants as the test score gap discussed above – predicts a difference in first-year college GPA of less than 0.1.

I find this fascinating, and I think the move to test-optional admissions policies in college actually does a great amount of damage to the quality of student at an institution. I also find that High Schools who do not emphasize and assist in preparation for doing well on these standardized tests do great damage to their Seniors. We need to provide our children with every opportunity to succeed as they look toward college, and doing well on standardized testing is part of this, it’s common sense.

For reference here is a link to the study: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w33570/w33570.pdf

Technology in Education

Technology in Education

This was a really insightful article around the rapid embracing of educational technology brought about during the Pandemic. One interesting thing worth noting is that while declines in test scores intensified during the lockdowns, the author of this article also shows that this decline started before the lockdowns, in fact after 2012. What happened around 2012 … “the sudden appearance of a laptop or tablet on every student’s desk.” I’m consistently amazed when my student brings home a worksheet vs a form based lesson on Google Classroom. While I think technology is wonderful and should be embraced especially in schools, it’s also critical that there’s a balance between paper based and computer based education. I’m not certain we’ve found that balance yet and so I’m happy to come across more articles and evidence around the challenges faced with technology.

https://www.afterbabel.com/p/edtech-tragedy

Raising Revenue

Raising Revenue

As a school district we should double down on raising revenues to help increase our operating budget and close future year gaps. A few school districts in Massachusetts like Chelmsford and Gloucester have done this to some success. In fact, in 2011 Gloucester awarded naming rights to its outdoor athletic facilities to New Balance in exchange for $500,000 over ten years. While I’m not suggesting that Sutton could land a large corporate sponsor like New Balance, there are several small and medium size business in the area that might be game for this. I see this as an innovative way to raise revenue given that there aren’t any clear restrictions in State law prohibiting this and guiding policy could be instituted by the school committee. The Hopkinton School district has established guiding policies on this and Sutton could easily leverage some of the work done here as policy. Tough times call for innovative thinking and as a member of the committee I’ll bring innovative ideas to help raise revenues and close our budget gaps.